<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott Gibson | SEO Strategist | ElegantW3</title>
	<atom:link href="https://elegantw3.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://elegantw3.com</link>
	<description>SEO Content Strategy, Website Builds &#38; Authority Content That Ranks and Earns</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 08:56:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>

 
	<item>
		<title>Will AI Replace Content Writers? Ask What Robots Did to the Car Industry First</title>
		<link>https://elegantw3.com/will-ai-replace-content-writers/</link>
					<comments>https://elegantw3.com/will-ai-replace-content-writers/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Gibson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 12:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Architecture]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://elegantw3.com/?p=658</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quick answer AI will not replace content writers outright. Robots automated car-factory assembly in the 1960s–80s without emptying the workforce — jobs shifted into robotics maintenance and quality control. AI is doing the same to content: absorbing repetitive drafting while strategy and judgment stay human. A few months ago, the line going round LinkedIn was [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://elegantw3.com/will-ai-replace-content-writers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>Zero-Click Search Strategy: Design for the Visitor Who Clicks</title>
		<link>https://elegantw3.com/zero-click-search-strategy/</link>
					<comments>https://elegantw3.com/zero-click-search-strategy/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Gibson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 12:37:44 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search & GEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEO]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://elegantw3.com/?p=636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most zero-click advice stops at the click you lost. Get cited, win the featured snippet, show up in the AI Overview — that&#8217;s the whole playbook, everywhere you look. Nobody&#8217;s writing about the click you kept. That&#8217;s the more interesting problem. The visitor who scrolled past the AI Overview and clicked anyway has already told [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://elegantw3.com/zero-click-search-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Queensferry.net Got Cited in Google AI Overviews</title>
		<link>https://elegantw3.com/how-to-get-cited-in-google-ai-overviews/</link>
					<comments>https://elegantw3.com/how-to-get-cited-in-google-ai-overviews/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Gibson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 12:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search & GEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AI Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Architecture]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GEO]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://elegantw3.com/?p=593</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The short version Queensferry.net — my own tourism site — is currently cited as a source inside Google&#8217;s AI Overviews for cruise-day queries, verified across two separate anonymous searches. Not ranked top of the results. Quoted inside the AI-generated answer itself, alongside Cruise Critic and TripAdvisor. Screenshots attached below, dated and current. Context Queensferry.net is [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://elegantw3.com/how-to-get-cited-in-google-ai-overviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to Target Content for AI Overviews (and Why Ranking Isn&#8217;t Enough)</title>
		<link>https://elegantw3.com/how-to-target-content-for-ai-overviews/</link>
					<comments>https://elegantw3.com/how-to-target-content-for-ai-overviews/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott Gibson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 16:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[AI Search & GEO]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://elegantw3.com/?p=378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Most guides on how to target content for AI Overviews give you the same list: add FAQ schema, use question-based H2s, answer the query directly. That advice isn&#8217;t wrong — it&#8217;s just incomplete. The real issue is that ranking in the top 10 and getting cited in an AI Overview are no longer the same [&#8230;]]]></description>
		
					<wfw:commentRss>https://elegantw3.com/how-to-target-content-for-ai-overviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
